Sunday, April 12, 2009

English Commentary

Question1.
This article mainly talks about the dangers of listening to music or text messaging while driving or walking, and why people should refrain from doing these things. The article mentioned that students from Singapore are indifferent about this event. They still expressed their indifference in a very irresponsible manner, saying that looking out for pedestrians who do not hear car horns should be the driver’s responsibility, and not theirs. Students express that they would still listen to music or text message while walking or driving, even if they knew the dangers.


How to survive on the roads(Question2)

What if you died and you did not know what happened to you? Would you want to wake up in the hospital not knowing what happened to you? Text messaging while walking may not only be a hazard to yourself, but a hazard towards others. For example, if you were text messaging on the road without noticing the people in front of you, both parties would knock into each other, and in the worst case scenario, both will get injured. Listening to music while driving or walking on the road maybe an enjoyable thing, it can be a nuisance to others. Therefore, I think text messaging on the road and listening to music while doing other things should be controlled, so we would save more people. In this commentary I will tell you why doing those things should be seriously controlled.

Firstly, I think that listening to music while driving or walking should be banned, as it may cause accidents to happen. Earlier research by the RAC Foundation, a British motoring organization, found drivers were twice as likely to skip a red light while listening to music. Listening to music while driving reduces one’s reaction time by 15%, as researched by the RAC Foundation. Research conducted by the Canadian study showed that when people carry out various tasks while listening to music at 95 decibels reduce their reaction time by 20%. They conducted this experiment with music at 58 decibels, and reaction time was only reduced by 5%. In Mumbai, drivers are not allowed to listen to the radio while driving. If drivers get caught listening to music while driving, they will be fined heavily. The rationale of this rule is that music can disrupt other drivers, and the driver himself/herself. Listening to fast music nearly doubles the chances of meeting into an accident. Fast music causes the heart rate to increase significantly, and this would decrease reaction time of the driver. Youngsters these days like to listen to music at more than 50% of the maximum volume, and this would make them oblivious to their surroundings. Surgeon Chan Kwai Onn of K.O. Chan Ear Nose Throat Sinus and Sleep centre said that noise cancelling ear canal earphone can silence almost 100% of ambient noise, leading to the high possibility of accidents.

Next I also think that text messaging while driving or walking should also be banned. Research conducted by the RAC Foundation showed that text messaging while driving reduces reaction time by 35% this would eventually lead up to horrific accidents that would not only harm the driver, but also other drivers and pedestrians. Youngsters in Singapore like to text message while they are on the go, and by a research conducted by reporters showed that youngsters do not care that they bump into people while walking and text messaging at the same time. Another student said that if someone is walking towards him and is going to bump into him, it is the first person’s responsibility to look out for other people. I would say that this is seriously a misconception by students, and they need to know that their safety is in their own hands.

People might say that listening to fast paced music while driving or walking sets the mood for them and it should neither be controlled nor be banned. Yes, it is true that it really aids in making one’s feeling better, but I seriously think that feeling good is nothing compared to one’s safety. As people always say, and as I always say, nothing is comparable in importance that safety itself. I think that these students are looking for their own deaths, and should learn how to cherish life better. Life is more than just listening to fact paced music, and thinking that one is “cool” but listening to such music. No matter how cool you are, no one would notice you as a person, but notice you as a worldly nuisance. From my personal experience, I can tell you that messaging and listening to music while driving is not a very good idea to stay alive, but is a very good idea on how to die without knowing how you died. I myself nearly got hit by a speeding car when crossing the road while text messaging. Therefore, if you want to die for no reason, please do text message and listen to fast paced music as you walk or drive.

All in all, listening to fast paced music and text messaging while walking should be banned or controlled. Life should be cherished and therefore my conclusion. Imagine yourself as one of the people that died because of this, would you want to be one of them, it is free of charge! So put those mp3’s and phones away while walking or driving.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

intro

Ever wondered if we humans could live forever? So what is the thing about stem cell research? It helps us humans to advance in both medical science and life sciences. Why did the stupid bush ban it anyways? It should have been lifted a zillion years ago. In this post I shall explore more about the Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and why I agree that it should have been allowed.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Commentary

SO what is the thing about stem cell research? It helps us humans to advance in both medical science and life sciences. Why did the stupid bush ban it anyways? It should have been lifted a zillion years ago. In this post I shall explore more about the Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and why I agree that it should have been allowed.
Firstly, according the extensive research done by the National Health Board of U.S.A, doing research on stem cell research may have the potential for an outbreak of potentially fatal cancerous tumors caused by the therapeutic use of embryonic stem cells. Despite this con, stem cell research can unlock many unopened doors in medical science, such as the cure for heart diseases, cancer and paralysis.
Secondly, the results of stem cell research can produce cells that can regenerate any part of the human body. For one, cells can regenerate the degenerated cells in a paralyzed human being by the cause of a car accident, or industrial accidents. In such accidents, the spinal cord may be somehow broken or crushed, and stem cells can be used to regrow these cells and allow the person to enjoy the incredible feeling of walking and running around again.
As such, stem cell research should have been allowed a very long time ago, and Obama's decision was a wise one.
What President Obama did when he reversed President Bush's executive order banning embryonic stem cell research was based not on solid science, but his desire to cater to the anti-life, pro-abortion forces and their media allies who helped elect him.
In doing this, he created the potential for an outbreak of potentially fatal cancerous tumors caused by the therapeutic use of embryonic stem cells.
Moreover, he killed another Bush presidential order that funded some of the most promising research on the creation of embryonic-like stem cells from harmless but potent adult stem cells.
What President Obama did when he rescinded President Bush's federal ban on certain lines of embryonic stem cell research ultimately could cost American lives.
Obama and his subservient mainstream media allies ignored science in favor of politics, and the results will prove to be disastrous.
What most people are unaware of is that there are three types of stem cell research: there is embryonic stem cell research (ESC), there is induced pluripotent (IPSC) research, and adult stem cell research (ASC).
When Barack Obama rescinded George Bush's ban on federal funding on certain types of embryonic stem cell research he also rescinded Bush's Executive Order 13435 which had provided federal funding for induced pluripotent stem cell research using harmless adult stem cells manipulated into mimicking embryonic stem cells without the risk ESC cells entail.
This is where 72 different diseases are now being remedied or cured.
There are no embryonic stem cells being used anywhere in the world on humans, with one tragic exception. A boy treated with embryonic stem cells for a rare genetic disease developed benign tumors, casting doubt on claims of the therapy's safety and effectiveness.
According to media reports, the boy, now 17, received the ESC stem cells in 2001 at a Moscow hospital and four years later scans showed brain and spinal tumors. Israeli doctors removed the abnormal growth from his spine and their tests show it most probably was caused by the stem cells.
The Moscow doctors should have known better. It is well known that lab animals given embryonic stem cells routinely develop tumors and other malignant growths that eventually kill them. There is a 100 percent mortality rate among lab animals that develop these tumors.
That's why George Bush banned this lethal form of research that Barack Obama, who should have known better, has now legitimized by overturning this life-saving ban.
The reason that major drug companies such as Merck and Pfizer are not funding ESC research is because they have seen the research and it scared the daylights out of them. They realized that if they injected ESC cells into human beings and like lab animals, they show signs of cancers or lesions or tumors there will be huge class action suits, because they would have ignored all of the available data in research that shows that that's exactly what will happen.

The fact of the matter is embryonic stem cells kill. The research shows conclusively that they help rats and mice die and an Israeli boy grow tumors.
Barack Obama rescinded Bush's executive order banning this dangerous research, which has failed everywhere it has been tried, and then went on to eliminate funding for some of the most promising research on the use of pluripotent adult stem cells.
Unfortunately, those opposed to these actions have made the mistake of concentrating on the pro-life aspects of this controversy, while ignoring the scientific aspects, which prove our case conclusively.
We can win this case, by concentrating on the science, which is on our side.
Anyone who is willing to inject embryonic stem cell into their bodies needs to understand that -- like the Israeli boy and the lab animals-- they will grow tumors and lesions.
---
Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is heard on radio stations nationally as part of American Family Radio (www.afr.net). Look for Mike's newest book, "Twice Adopted" and other info at www.Reagan.com. E-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.
--------------------
Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.

(this is a sample)